The Contestation of Islamic Boarding School Womens's View of Wifes' Rights in Poligamy
PDF

Keywords

Wives' Rights
Contestation
Islamic Boarding School Women
Polygamy

How to Cite

Nurnazli, N., Ahmad, H. O. ., Firdawaty, L. ., al Arif, M. Y. ., & Akmansyah, M. . (2024). The Contestation of Islamic Boarding School Womens’s View of Wifes’ Rights in Poligamy. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1349

Abstract

This study examines the contention around Islamic boarding school women's view of wives' rights in polygamous marriages. It aims to answer academic questions, specifically how and why there is contention among Islamic boarding school women over the rights of wives in polygamy. Furthermore, it also aims to answer what consequences this contestation has for the practice of polygamy, which is common in Islamic boarding schools. This paper is an empirical research that takes a sociological perspective. The analysis is based on Pierre Bourdieu's Cultural Sociology theory. Data were gathered through an interview study with research subjects from five traditional Islamic boarding schools in Lampung Province. The findings of this study show that the contestation of wives' rights in polygamy is influenced by the level of understanding of religious texts and norms, social and economic realities, and the strength of the patriarchal traditions and systems that surround it. Most women are denied the opportunity to fight for their bodily and spiritual rights, both before and after polygamous marriage occurs. Women in Islamic boarding schools recognize that men's supremacy influences the neglect of women's rights in polygamy because their understanding of religious texts is conservative. Women have no bargaining power when their husbands seek to practice polygamy. Conservatives believe that polygamy is a fate and consequence that women who want to marry a caregiver or an Islamic boarding school leader (Kyai) must accept. A moderate perspective necessitates that polygamy be practiced with proportional rights between husband and wife. The repercussions of this contestation have resulted in a better appreciation of the importance of men's and women's rights being proportionate, as well as mutual protection.

https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1349
PDF

References

Journals

Aini, Nurul. “Perlindungan Hak Anak Dalam Perkawinan Poligami Di Indonesia.” De Jure 9, no. 2 (2017).

Alamgir, Aurangzaib. “Islam and Polygamy: A Case Study in Malaysia.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 114 (2014): 889–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.803.

Al-Krenawi, Alean, dan John R. Graham. “The story of Bedouin-Arab women in a polygamous marriage.” Women’s Studies International Forum 22, no. 5 (1999): 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00054-0.

Anam, Haikal Fadhil. “Poligami dalam Hermeneutika Feminis Amina Wadud.” Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol.19, No, no. Januari 2020 (2020): 43. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2020.191.43-56.

Anas, Achmad Faizal. “Kecamatan Burneh, dan Kabupaten Bangkalan.” Jurnal Dialektika Vol. XII No.1 Maret 2017 | 1 XII, no. 1 (2017): 1–20.

Arifah, Anis Nur. “POLIGAMI KIAI: PRAKTEK POLIGAMI KIAI DI KOTA JEMBER DALAM PANDANGAN KHI DAN GENDER.” Yudisia, Vol. 7, No. 1, Juni 2016 7 No. 1, no. Poligami (t.t.): 120–45. https://doi.org/10.21043.

Azwar, Zainal, Firdaus, and Anshari Az Zarqy. “Polygamy Permits for Business Reasons (Analysis of Sawahlunto Religious Court Ruling Number: 045/Pdt.G/2018/Pa.Swl).” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 20, no. 2 (2021): 163. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.4385.

Danial. “Polygamy in Perspective of Islamic Law Hermeneutics.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2023): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.5139.

Farah, Naila. “Hak-hak perempuan dalam Islam.” Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak 15, no. 2 (2020): 183–206. https://doi.org/10.24090/yinyang.v15i2.3953.

Farid, M, dan M A Hidayat. “Perlawanan Perempuan Pesantren Terhadap Poligami Kiai di Madura.” Edukasi Islami: Jurnal … 10, no. 02 (2021): 992–1009. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v10i02.1805.

Hadi, Mukhammad Nur. “THE NARRATIVE OF PROTECTING POLYGAMOUS WOMEN IN INDONESIA’S DIGITAL WORLD: Between Moderate and Conservative Muslims.” Al-Ahwal 15, no. 2 (2022): 161–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2022.15201.

Hariyanto. “Dehumanisasi Terhadap Perempuan dalam Praksis Poligami.” Palastren 8, no. 1 (2015): 79–102.

Hidayatulloh, Haris. “Adil Dalam Poligami Perspektif Ibnu Hazm.” Religi Jurnal Studi Islam 6 (2015): 207–36.

Hikmah, Nurul and Agung Ari Subagyo. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Terkait Praktik Poligami Siri Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” LENTERA: Journal of Gender and Children Studies 2, no. 1 (2020): 35–54.

Hikmah, Siti. “Fakta Poligami Sebagai Bentuk Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan.” Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender 7, no. 2 (2012): 1. https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v7i2.646.

Indra, Gandi Liyorba, M. Yasin Al Arif, dan Abdul Qodir Zaelani. “The Ideal Age For Marriage in The Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and Psychology.” Al-’Adalah 20, no. 1 (20 Juni 2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v20i1.11598.

Irma, Ade, dan Dessy Hasanah. “Menyoroti Budaya Patriarki di Indonesia.” Social Work 7, no. 1 (2014): 71–80.

Khalik, Subehan. “Menakar Teologi Keadilan Dalam Poligami.” Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum 19, no. 1 (2019): 57. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v19i1.10198.

Ma’u, Dahlia Haliah. “The Harmonization of Polygamy Between Islamic Law and Legal Law in Indonesia.” Samarah 7, no. 2 (2023): 669–86. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.8519.

Mahasin, Ashwab. “‘Poligami’ Bentuk Ketaatan Atau Keegoisan Antara Suami Dan Istri (Kajian Surat An-Nisa Ayat 3 Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan).” Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Studi Islam 2, no. 2 (2020): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v2i2.51.

Mujtaba, Wardah, Kasuwi Saiban, & Soheila Rostami. “Maintaining Family Harmony in Islamic Law According to Madhhab of Imam Shafi’i.” NALAR FIQH: Jurnal Hukum Islam 14, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.30631/nf.v14i2.1406

Musarrofa, Ita. “Mekanisme Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan dalam Rumah Tangga Perspektif Teori Kekerasan Simbolik Pierre Bourdieu.” Asy-Syir’ah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum 49, no. 2 (2015): 458–78.

Nabil, Muhammad Faried. “NARASI POLIGAMI DI KALANGAN MUSLIMAH AKTIVIS DAKWAH KAMPUS DI YOGYAKARTA Konservatisme dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 12, no. 1 (2020): 65. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2019.12106.

Nurmila, Nina. “Polygamous marriages in indonesia and their impacts on women’s access to income and property.” Al-Jami’ah 54, no. 2 (2016): 427–46. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2016.542.427-446.

Nurnazli. “Transformasi Hukum Harta Bersama Di Indonesia Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Agung.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 11, no. 2 (2020): 82. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2018.11207.

Rizkal. “Poligami Tanpa Izin Isteri Dalam Perspektif Hukum: Bentuk Kekerasan Psikis Terhadap Isteri.” Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum Dan Keadilan 22, no. 01 (2019): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v22i01.2017.

Rohmaniyah, Inayah, Samia Kotele, Mustaqim Pabbajah, and Hasna Safarina Rasyidah. “Female Ulama’s Authority: Deconstructing Masculine Domination in Islamic Norms and Practices.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 21 (2022): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.21.2022.225.

Saleemi, Sundus, and Chiara Kofol. “Women’s participation in household decisions and gender equality in children’s education: Evidence from rural households in Pakistan.” World Development Perspectives 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100395.

Witte, J., Jr., dan A. Pin. “The refusal of poligamy in the Western world: The reasons.” Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo 22, no. 1 (2020): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.17394/96303.

Books

Al-Athar, ‘Abd al-Nashr Taufiq al-Athar. Ta’adud al-Zawjah min Nawahi al-Diniyyah wa al-Ijtima’iyyah wa al-Qanuuniyyah. Qohirah: al-Syarikah al-Mishriyyah li al-Thalabah wa al-Nasyr, 1974.

Al-Dossari, Mahmoud Ahmad. Fair Distinction between Men and Women in Islam. 1’st Edition. Saudi Arabia: Dar Ibn Al-Jawzi, n.d.

Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad. Al-Mustashfa. Edited by Muhammad Abdel Salam. 1st Edition. Edited by Muhammad Abdel Salam. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1993.

Al-Jaziri, Abdurrahman. Al-Fiqh ála Mazahib al-Arbaáh. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, t.th.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Choses Dites: Uraian dan Pemikiran.Translate by Ninik Rochani Sjams. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2011.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Masculine Domination. Standford University Press: Standford University Press, 2001.

Hakim, Eka. “Dengar Suami Poligami, Perempuan di Bone Bunuh Diri.” Liputan6.com, Bone, 2017.

HIY, Kyai. “No Title.” Bandar Lampung, 2022.

Ibn Al-Arabi, Muhammad ibn Abdullah Abu Bakr Al-Maliki. Aḥkām al-Qurān [The Rules of Quran]. Compiled and Commented by Muhammad Abdul Qadir Atta. 3rd Edition. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyya, 2003.

Ibn Hazm. Al-Muhalla fi Syarh al-Mujalla bi al-Hujaj wa al-Athar. Riyadh: Bait al-afkar al-Dauliah, t.t.

Ibn al-Qayyim, Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr ibn Ayyub al-Jawziyyah. I'lām al-Muwaqqiʿīn ʿan Rab al-ʿAlamīn (Informing the Signatories about the Lord of the Worlds]) Edited by Muhammad Abd Al-Salam Ibrahim. 1st Edition. Yarut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1991.

M. Quraish Shihab. Ensiklopedia Al-Qur’an: Kajian Kosakata dan Tafsirnya. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2009.

Nyai StK. “No Title.” Interview with the wife of one of the MM Islamic Boarding School caretakers, Bandar Lampung, 2022.

Rokhmansyah, Alfian. “Rokhmansyah, Alfian. Pengantar Gender dan Feminisme: Pemahaman Awal Kritik Sastra Feminisme. Yogyakarta: Garudawhaca, 2016No Title.” Dalam Pengantar Gender dan Feminisme: Pemahaman Awal Kritik Sastra Feminisme, 1 ed., 20. Yogyakarta: Garuda Whaca, 2016.

Wacquant, Pierre Bourdieu dan Loïc J. D. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

William J Goode. Sosiologi Keluarga. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1991.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Nurnazli Nurnazli, Hashm Omer Ahmad, Linda Firdawaty, M. Yasin al Arif, Muhammad Akmansyah

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.