Disobedience of Constitutional Court Decision as a Reason for Impeachment of President and Vice President
PDF

Keywords

Constitutional
Disobedience
Impeachment Pembangkangan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Pemakzulan
Presiden dan Wakil Presiden

How to Cite

Pahlawan MP, H. M. R. ., Adhistianto, M. F., & Nunna, B. P. . (2024). Disobedience of Constitutional Court Decision as a Reason for Impeachment of President and Vice President. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1509

Abstract

This article discusses disobedience of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 which was carried out by the Government by issuing Minister of Home Affairs Instruction Number 68 of 2021 Concerning Follow-Up of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding the Formal Review of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation which in essence states that it remains guided and implement Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and its Implementing Regulations. This instruction from the Minister of Home Affairs has violated one of the rulings stating that the legally binding force of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation must be temporarily suspended for 2 (two) years or until the process of its formation has been repaired. This study uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach and is also evaluated descriptively and qualitatively. The conclusion of this paper is that disobedience to the constitution by the Government will have a juridical impact on not realizing legal certainty, impacting people's distrust of the Constitutional Court, as well as a bad example given by the President in terms of constitutional awareness, so that it is appropriate for the DPR RI to file an impeachment process against the president

https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1509
PDF

References

Journals

Alrasyid, Aldys Rismelin, dan Sunny Ummul Firdaus. “Mengkaji Inkonstitusional Bersyarat Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Terhadap Kedudukan Omnibus Law.” Souvereignty: Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional 1, no. 3 (2022).https://doi.org/10.13057/souvereignty.v1i3.163.

Amnan, Durohim. “Legalitas Pemecatan Hakim Aswanto Di Tengah Masa Jabatan Oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat.” Jatiswara 38, no. 1 (31 Maret 2023).

Amrullah, Amrullah, and Ahmad Rizki. "Tinjauan Maqashid Syariah terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/Puu-Xv/2017 tentang Permohonan Batas Usia Kawin." El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 3.1 (2020): 115-124. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v38i1.461.

Anindia, Adella, Rosmini, dan Poppilea Erwinta. “Perbandingan Konstitusional Pengaturan Impeachment Presiden Antara Indonesia Dengan Jerman.” Risalah Hukum, 30 Desember 2021, 65–84.https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i2.600.

Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani. “The Interpretation of Misconduct Act as A Reason to Dismiss President: An Ethical Approach.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 13, no. 1 (28 Juli 2021). https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.12122.

Anwar, Malik, dan Wulan Chorry Shafira. “Anomali Peraturan Presiden Nomor 113 tahun 2021 tentang Struktur dan Penyelenggaraan Bank Tanah Ditinjau dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Pengujian Formil UU Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 11, no. 1 (30 April 2022): 99.https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.866.

Aziz, Machmud. “Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 5 (20 Mei 2016): 113. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk756.

Bustamin, Bustamin, dan Rony Jaya. “Urgensi Checks And Balances Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dan Islam.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 18, no. 2 (30 Desember 2019): 221. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v18i2.1740.

Camelia, Andini, Cenlia Brigita Engkolan, Rachmawati Sukarno Putri, Nasywa Laffaiza, dan Tazkia Tunnafsia Siregar. “Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Terhadap Kedudukan UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja.” Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 1 (2023).https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v14i1.12200.

De Sousa, Freidelino Paixao Ramos Alves. “Non-compliance with Constitutional Court Decisions as an Act of Contempt of Court.” Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 4, no. 2 (20 November 2022): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v4i2.54617.

Dewi, Anies Prima. “Problematik Putusan Mahkamah Konstiusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education 3, no. 2 (3 Oktober 2017): 243. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v3i2.162

Faqih, Mariyadi. “Nilai-Nilai Filosofi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Final dan Mengikat.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (20 Mei 2016): 097. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk734.

Fauzan, Muhammad. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Proses Impeachment Presiden Menurut Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 1 (1 Februari 2011). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.66.

Fikriawan, Suad, Syamsul Anwar, and Misnen Ardiansyah. "The Paradigm of Progressive Judge’s Decision and Its Contribution to Islamic Legal Reform in Indonesia." Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15.2 (2021): 249-262.

Gani, Iskandar A., et al. "The Constitutional Court’s Protection and Fulfilment of the Citizens’ Rights: Constitutional and Islamic Law Perspectives." Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 8.1 (2024): 317-338.

Hadi, Syofyan. “Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden (Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, Dan Filipina).” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 23 (9 Februari 2016): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v12i23.883.

Hadistianto, Mohammad Fandrian, dan Siti Rohmah. “Paradoks Implementasi Kebijakan Upah Minimum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 1 (7 Maret 2023): 175. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v12i1.8436.

Hasan, Ahmadi, Anwar Hafidzi, and Yusna Zaidah. "Modern Law Aspect on Procedural Decision of Sultan Adam Law." Al-Ahkam 29.2 (2019): 159-166.

Kristiyanto, Eko Noer. “Pemakzulan Presiden Republik Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 2, no. 3 (31 Desember 2013): 331.https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i3.63.

M. Nggilu, Novendri. “Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (1 April 2019): 43. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1613.

Noor, Salafuddin, Ahmadi Hasan, and Nuril Khasyi'in. "Review of Political Theory of Islamic Law Abul'Ala Al Maududy Positive Perspective of the Political System of Indonesian Islamic Law." Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 23.1 (2023): 36-49.

Nurjamil, Faisal Faturrahman. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Kostitusi dalam Memutus Usulan Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia.” AHKAM 2, no. 2 (24 Mei 2023): 313–26. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1141.

Oktava, M. Saoki, dan Riska Ari Amalia. “Paradoks Pemakzulan Presiden/Wakil Presiden Dalam Prinsip Negara Hukum.” Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (31 Oktober 2019): 199. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v10i2.2249.

Permatasari, Angghie, Lusy Liany, dan Amir Mahmud. “Disharmonisasi Antara Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Agung Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 30/PUU-XVI/2018 dan Putusan Nomor 65 P/HUM/2018 dengan Pemohon Oesman Sapta Odang).” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 19, no. 1 (29 Juni 2020): 97. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v19i1.2043.

Prabowo, Edi. “Mekanisme Pemakzulan (Impeachment) Presiden: Studi Pebandingan Negara Indonesia dan Brasil.” JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law 1, no. 1 (26 Januari 2021): 119–44. https://doi.org/10.18326/jil.v1i2.119-144.

Pradana, Fadly Ikhsan. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Tidak Dilaksanakan Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Ditinjau Dari Asas Erga Omnes.” Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 3, no. 2 (30 Oktober 2021): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v3i2.45660.

Putra, Antoni. “Implications of Conditional Unconstitutional Decisions in The Constitutional Court Decision.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 1 (25 Maret 2023): 58–77. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2014.

Rohmah, Elva Imeldatur. “Mekanisme Pemakzulan Presiden Sebelum Dan Sesudah Terbentuknya Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia.” As-Shahifah Jurnal oc Constitution and Government 2, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.19105/asshahifah.v2i2.6955.

Sarpini, Sarpini. "Prosedur Menyelesaikan Kasus Hukum Dengan Ijma>'." El-Mashlahah 9.1 (2019).

Satriya, Catur Alfath. “Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 3 (30 Agustus 2022):https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1932.

Setiadi, Wicipto. “Dukungan Politik Dalam Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding; Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 2, no. 3 (2013). https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/view/?id=132&isi=artikel.

Siahaan, Maruarar. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Konstitusi.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 16, no. 3 (2009): 357–78. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss3.art3.

Soeroso, Fajar Laksono. “Pembangkangan’ Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 3 (2013).http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v6i3.100

Suhardjana, Johannes. “Supremasi Konstitusi Adalah Tujuan Negara.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 10, no. 3 (15 Oktober 2010).https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.3.96.

Suhartono, Slamet. "Eksistensi Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Pancasila." Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 12.2 (2017): 448-465.

Sulistyoko, Arie. “Pemakzulan Presiden Dalam Persepsi Konstitusi (Studi Kasus Presiden Abdurrahman Wahid).” Syariah Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 16, no. 1 (10 Oktober 2017): 47. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v16i1.1431.

Syawaludin, dan Arif Wibowo. “Analisis Problematika Yang Terjadi Pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat.” Jurnal Penelitian Multi Disiplin 1, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v1i2.64

Taufiqurrohman, AH Asari, et al. "The Role of Islamic Law, Constitution, and Culture in Democracy in the UAE and Indonesia." AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24.1 (2024).

Tohadi, Tohadi, dan Dian Eka Prastiwi. “Rekonstruksi Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Kepatuhan Pembentuk Undang-Undang Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Mekanisme Checks And Balances.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 11, no. 1 (30 April 2022): 19.https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.849.

Wajdi, Farid, dan Andryan Andryan. “Sifat Putusan Impeachment MK Terhadap Status Hukum Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 3 (29 September 2020):https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.301-314.

Wardani, Ivana Eka Kusuma. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mengawal Prinsip Checks and Balances Terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah di Indonesia.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 2, no. 2 (13 Desember 2019): 239–52. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v2i2.2883.

Wastia, Ryan Muthiara. “Mekanisme Impeachment Di Negara Dengan Sistem Presidensial: Studi Perbandingan Mekanisme Impeachment Di Indonesia Dan Korea Selatan.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 31, no. 2 (3 Juni 2019): 237. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.39068.

Widiarto, Aan Eko. “Ketidakpastian Hukum Kewenangan Lembaga Pembentuk Undang-Undang Akibat Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (20 Mei 2016): 735. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1244.

Windyantoro, Widy Angga, dan Frans Simangunsong. “Analisis Putusan MK NO.91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Terhadap Perpres No.113 Tahun 2021 Tentang Struktur Dan Penyelenggaraan Bank Tanah.” Jurnal Abdikarya: Jurnal Karya Pengabdian Dosen Dan Mahasiswa 5, no. 1 (25 Juni 2022): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.30996/abdikarya.v5i1.6733.

Zulhidayat, Muhammad. “Perbandingan Konstitusional : Pengaturan Impeachment Di Indonesia Dan Italia.” Jurnal Hukum Replik 7, no. 1 (31 Maret 2020): 1. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v7i1.2543

Zada, Khamami. "Sharia and Islamic state in Indonesia constitutional democracy: an Aceh experience." Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 23.1 (2023): 1-17.

Zada, K., et al. "Constitutionalizing Sharia: Identity and Independence of Islamic Politics Among Students. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 21 (2), 195–206." (2022).

Books

Haris, Syamsuddin. Pemilu, dan Parlemen Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2014.

R., Hanta Yuda A. Presidensialisme setengah hati : dari dilema ke kompromi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010.

Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.

Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2015.

Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016.

Yurikosari, Andari, Mohammad Fandrian Hadistianto, Sugeng Santoso, Horadin Saragih, dan Joice Soraya. Masalah-masalah hukum pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.19/PUU-XVIII/2020. Depok: PT Rajawali Buana Pusaka, 2022.

Zoelva, Hamdan. Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Theses/Dissertation

Sari, Elma Saida Rahma. “Implikasi Yuridis Pembangkangan Konstitusi (Constitutional Disobediance) Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” 2021. https://fh.unram.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ELMA-SAIDA-R-D1A017089.pdf.

Websites

Abdullah, Abdul Gani. “Laporan Akhir Tim Pengkajian Hukum tentang Impeachment dalam Sisten Hukum Tata Negara.” BPHN, December 2005. https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/25pengkajian_impeachmant.pdf.

Simmonds, RL, ID Petersen, AG Braddock, dan HJ Kay. “Discussion Paper On Contempt By Disobedience To The Orders Of The Court.” Discussion Paper. Australia: Law Reform Commission of Western Australia, November 2022. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2021-04/LRC-Project-093-3-Discussion-Paper.pdf.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 H.Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP, Mohamad Fandrian Adhistianto,Bhanu Prakash Nunna

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.