JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN INDONESIA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT: The Adjudication of Regional Election Disputes

Adithiya Diar; Beny Saputra

doi:10.30631/alrisalah.v25i2.1920

Authors

Adithiya Diar Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi
Beny Saputra Department of Legal Studies, Central European University (CEU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v25i2.1920

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Judicial Activism, Regional Head Election Result Disputes, Threshold

Abstract

In resolving disputes over regional head election results, the Constitutional Court often takes legal steps by postponing the application of the vote margin threshold. In addition, the Court makes judicial reasoning to harmonize various interpretations among election organizers. This study aims to identify the reasons for the deferment of the threshold application and to examine the Constitutional Court's judicial reasoning in handling this dispute. Using normative legal research methods with a conceptual, statutory, and case-based approach, this study concludes that the Constitutional Court has set aside the vote margin threshold in extraordinary cases, particularly in cases involving procedural violations or candidates' ineligibility to advance as participants. This is evident in election disputes from 2016 to 2025. Another conclusion is that the Constitutional Court's use of judicial reasoning aims to resolve legal ambiguity and prevent inconsistencies in the application of election norms among stakeholders. The findings of this study carry significant strategic implications for both election organisers and lawmakers. This study contributes to the understanding of how the Constitutional Court's judicial activism shapes electoral justice and the need for legislative harmonization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Galligan, Brian. “Judicial Activism in Australia BT -.” In Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective, edited by Kenneth M Holland, 70–89. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11774-1_5.

Garner, Bryan A. “Black’s Law Dictionary.” West Group, 2004.

Hendrianto, Stefanus. Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts: Indonesia and the Search for Judicial Heroes. Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315100043.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Journals

Barroso, Luís Roberto. “Countermajoritarian, Representative, and Enlightened: The Roles of Constitutional Courts in Democracies.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 67, no. 1 (June 17, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz009.

BOIX, CARLES. “Democracy, Development, and the International System.” American Political Science Review 105, no. 4 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000402.

Butt, Simon. “Constitutional Court Decisions on the Judicial Independence of Other Indonesian Courts.” Constitutional Review 9, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev922.

Cummings, Scott L. “The Social Movement Turn in Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 43, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12308.

Epstein, Lee, Olga Shvetsova, and Jack Knight. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government.” Law & Society Review 35, no. 1 (2001). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2307/3185388.

Garlicki, Lech. “Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5, no. 1 (January 1, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol044.

Hasni, H., Bachri, S., & Fatmawati, S. "Analysis of Law Enforcement on Crime of Regional Head Elections in South Konawe Regency." Al-’Adl, 14(2), (2021). https://doi.org/10.31332/aladl.v14i2.2656

Lyons, Terrence. “Post-Conflict Elections and the Process of Demilitarizing Politics: The Role of Electoral Administration.” Democratization 11, no. 3 (June 1, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000238167.

Marilang, Marilang. “Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 2 SE-Articles (November 2, 2017). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1424.

Metzger, Gillian E. “Ordinary Administrative Law as Constitutional Common Law.” Columbia Law Review, Vol.110. 479 (2010). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780662.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Guarding Democracy: Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decisions in Regional Head Electoral Disputes. Constitutional Review 11.1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1112.

Mpesau, Alasman. “Diskursus Atas Mantan Terpidana Sebagai Calon Kepala Daerah.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati 6, no. 1 SE- (March 30, 2024). https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v6i1.8814.

Musyafiatun, Musyafiatun. “Pencalonan Mantan Narapidana Sebagai Anggota Legislatif Perspektif Fikih Siyasah.” Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam 4, no. 02 (2015). https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2014.4.02.561-587.

Nggilu, Novendri M, Yassine Chami, Indra Perwira, and Ali Abdurahman. “The Absence of Judicial Review on Constitutional Amendments in Indonesia: Urgency and Legal Reform for Constitutional Safeguards.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 6, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.20888.

Nyathi, Mkhululi. “Re-Asserting the Doctrinal Legal Research Methodology in the South African Academy: Navigating the Maze,” South African Law Journal Vol. 140, No. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v140/i2a5.

Prabowo, Bagus Surya. “Menggagas Judicial Activism Dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 1 SE-Articles (March 28, 2022). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1914.

Prawira, S. A. “Election violation and election law enforcement in the general election in Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 4(1), (2019). https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v4i1.424

Sampe, John, Rosa Ristawati, and Be Hakyou. “The Guardian of Constitution: A Comparative Perspective of Indonesia and Cambodia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 9, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v9i2.4627.

Saragih, Geofani Milthree, Mirza Nasution, and Eka N A M Sihombing. “Judicial Review by the Constitutional Court: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint in the Perspective of Judicial Freedom” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 1 SE-Articles (March 1, 2025). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2213.

Suarda, I Gede Widhiana, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Fendi Setyawan, and Vicko Taniady. “Debating Political Rights: The Revocation of Former Convicts’ Rights to Be Elected in Indonesian Elections.” Lentera Hukum 12, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v12i1.52923

Tumpa, Harifin A. “Penerapan Konsep Rechtsvinding dan Rechtsschepping Oleh Hakim Dalam Memutus Suatu Perkara.” Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 2 (2015). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i2.90.

Vachudova, Milada Anna. “Populism, Democracy, and Party System Change in Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102711.

Websites

Arfana, Nano Tresna. “Aswanto: MK Bukan Mahkamah Kalkulator.” mkri.Id, 2020. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=16719.

Febriyanto, Satrio Alif. “Judicial Activism MK Dalam Putusan Dismissal Perselisihan Hasil Pilkada 2024.” hukumonline.com, 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/judicial-activism-mk-dalam-putusan-dismissal-perselisihan-hasil-pilkada-2024-lt67bdf23241c58.

Mkri.id. “MK Penegak Keadilan Substantif.” mkri.Id, 2010. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=4113&menu=2.

———, “Rekapitulasi Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah,” mkri.Id, 2025. https://www.mkri.id/perkara/rekapitulasi-perkara/phpkada.

Laws

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 14/PHP.BUP-XIX/2017.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 42/PHP.BUP-XV/2017.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 52/PHP.BUP-XV/2017.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 71/PHP.BUP-XVI/2018.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 84/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 132/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 133/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 02/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 05/PHPU.WAKO-XXIII/2025.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 70/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 195/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 313/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025.

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.

Law Number 16 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation instead of Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents, and Mayors to Become Law.