LAYERED HYBRID MODEL IN CRIMINAL RESOLUTION: Integrating Epkeret and State Law Under Legal Pluralism in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v26i1.2180Keywords:
Customary Criminal Law, Legal Pluralism, Layered Hybrid Model, Restorative Justice, The Living LawAbstract
The ratification of the New Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) marks a paradigm shift towards restorative justice by recognizing the fulfillment of customary obligations as a valid criminal sanction. However, the absence of procedural technical guidelines creates a significant gap in the integration of customary law into the formal justice system, which could lead to legal uncertainty. This study aims to develop an operational framework using a “Layered Hybrid Model” to bridge customary criminal law and state law without violating human rights. Using sociological-legal methods and empirical data from South Buru Island, Maluku, as well as comparative analysis of customary courts in New Zealand and Canada, this study formulates a two-tiered mechanism. The first tier places customary law (Epkeret) as the primum remedium for social restoration, while the second tier establishes state law as the ultimum remedium for serious crimes. This article offers the first operational institutional design for customary criminal justice in Indonesia by proposing a State-Community Validation Forum as a constitutional filter mechanism. This model encourages a transition from weak legal pluralism to “strong and controlled legal pluralism,” ensuring that customary justice is constitutionally valid and operationally applicable in a modern criminal justice system.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Journals
Adhari, Ade, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Shidarta Shidarta, Anis Widyawati, and Leony Sondang Suryani. “Position for the Formulation of the Principle of Ultimum Remedium in the Criminal Law Codes in Various Countries.” Lex Scientia Law Review 8, no. 1 (2024): 223–260. https: //doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14061.
Aulia, Muhammad Zulfa, et al. “The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (2023): 423–450. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk3034.
Bahri, Robi Assadul. “Konsep Penegakan Hukum Pidana Adat di Indonesia Berdasarkan Asas Kepastian Hukum.” Law, Development & Justice Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 61–74. https://doi.org/10. 14710/ ldjr.7.2024.61-74.
Berman, Paul Schiff, and Sujith Xavier. “Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders.” European Journal of International Law 24, no. 3 (2012): 981–987. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/ejil/cht057.
Butt, Simon. “Indonesia’s New Criminal Code: Indigenising and Democratising Indonesian Criminal Law?” Griffith Law Review 32, no. 2 (2023): 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772.
Carrino, Agostino. “History, Society, Reason: The Controversy between Eugen Ehrlich and Hans Kelsen on the Sociology of Law.” Droit et Société 113, n° 1 (2023): 205–230. https://doi.org /10.3917/drs1.113.0205.
Djawas, Mursyid, et al. “Harmonization of State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Perspective of Legal Pluralism.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824.
Erwinsyahbana, T. “Perspektif Pendekatan Keadilan Restorasi dan Hukum Pidana Adat Minangkabau.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 4, no. 3 (2023): 186–198. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v4i3.454.
Faisal, M. “Hybrid Legal System dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa.” JURIS: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 20, no. 1 (2021): 45–60.
Farikhah, Mufatikhatul. “The Judicial Pardon Arrangement as a Method of Court Decision.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2021): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v8n1.a1.
Irfan, M. Nurul. “Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Pidana Islam.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 17, no. 2 (2017): 245–262.
———. “Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Pidana Islam.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–20.
Istiqomah, Nanda Firdaus Puji. “Legitimacy of Customary Institution Decisions.” Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 3 (2025): 1–13.
Karnozova, ?. ?. “Reconciliation Discourses and Problems of Institutionalization.” (2024): 239–253. https://doi.org/10. 17759/psylaw. 2024140217.
Merry, Sally Engle. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988): 869–896.
Rabault, Hugues. “‘Global Bukovina’: Gunther Teubner’s Homage to Eugen Ehrlich.” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 44, Nr. 1 (2024): 48–66. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/zfrs-2024-1005.
Sumaya, Pupu Sriwulan. “Konflik Antara Hukum Adat dan Hukum Negara.” Manifesto Journal 3, no. 2 (2025): 1–12.
Setyawan, Vincent Patria. “Hukum yang Membebaskan.” Journal of Law: Legal Advice 2, no. 1 (2025): 45–54.
Rachmanto, Fandri. “The Application of Penal Mediation.” Justisi 11, no. 2 (2025): 317–332. https://doi.org/10.33506/js. v11i2.3961.
Roach, Kent. “Restorative Justice in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Criminology 46, no. 3 (2004): 249–272.
Teslatu, Leo Christy Menoha. “Epkeret Customary Sanctions.” [Thesis-derived discussion cited in journal context].
Teubner, Gunther, et al. “Constitutionalizing Polycontexturality.” Social & Legal Studies 20, no. 2 (2011): 209–252.
Tongat. “The Ambiguous Authority of Living Law Application.” International Journal of Criminal Justice Science 17, no. 2 (2022): 188–209.
Utama, Tody Sasmitha Jiwa. “Between Adat Law and Living Law.” Journal of Legal Pluralism 53, no. 2 (2021): 269–289.
Wahyuni, Fitri. “Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Ijtihad 20, no. 1 (2020): 85–102.
Widodo, Derick, et al. “Restitution as an Instrument of Justice.” MILRev 4, no. 1 (2025): 676–699.
Research Reports / Theses / Dissertations
Teslatu, Leo Christy Menoha. “Pengenaan Sanksi Adat ‘Epkeret’ Terhadap Kasus Pembunuhan.” Thesis, Fakultas Hukum UKSW, 2017.
Books
Aryani, Adriana Venny. “Customary Justice and Restorative Mechanisms in Papua.” In The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics, edited by Jamie S. Davidson and David Henley, 115–130. London: Routledge, 2007.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, und Keebet von Benda-Beckmann. Political and Legal Transformations of an Indonesian Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Davidson, Jamie S., and David Henley, eds. The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics. London: Routledge, 2007.
Ehrlich, Eugen. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.
Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas, 2009.
———. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.
Laws / Regulations
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Judy Marria Saimima, Adonia Ivonne Laturette, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Rory Jeff Akyuwen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
